Lectures

Rethinking the Rationale(s) for Hearsay Exceptions

By Stephen A. Salzburg
February 22, 2016
Continue Reading in The Full PDF

March 2016

Vol. 84

No. 4

Related Reads

Lectures

Prior Inconsistent Statements and Substantive Evidence—Federal Rule 801(D)(1)(A): The Compromise
By Stephen A. Saltzburg
Reality Check: A Modest Modification to Rationalize Rule 803 Hearsay Exceptions
By Liesa L. Richter
On Hearsay
By the Honorable Richard A. Posner
Forward Progress: A New Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction for Impeachment with Prior Inconsistent Statements Will Ease the Court’s Burden by Emphasizing the Prosecutor’s
By Hugh M. Mundy
Prior Statements of Testifying Witnesses: Drafting Choices to Eliminate or Loosen the Strictures of the Hearsay Rule
By Daniel J. Capra
The British Experience with Hearsay Reform: A Cautionary Tale
By Mark S. Brodin

Join Our Mailing List

  • FORDHAM LAW REVIEW ©2023