Fixing Rule 702: The PCAST Report and Steps to Ensure the Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods in the Criminal Courts – Fordham Law Review

Symposium

Fixing Rule 702: The PCAST Report and Steps to Ensure the Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods in the Criminal Courts

By Eric S. Lander

February 28, 2018

Related Reads

Symposium

The Duty to Investigate and the Availability of Expert Witnesses

By Stephen A. Saltzburg

Deceptively Simple: Framing, Intuition, and Judicial Gatekeeping of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods Evidence

By Jane Campbell Moriarty

Fast Times in Federal Court and the Need for Flexibility

How Daubert and Its Progeny Have Failed Criminalistics Evidence and a Few Things the Judiciary Could Do About It

By David H. Kaye

The Critical Role of Statistics in Demonstrating the Reliability of Expert Evidence

By Karen Kafadar

Challenges Facing Judges Regarding Expert Evidence in Criminal Cases

By Paul W. Grimm

Join Our Mailing List