The Adverse Inference Instruction After Revised Rule 37(e): An Evidence-Based Proposal – Fordham Law Review

Lectures

The Adverse Inference Instruction After Revised Rule 37(e): An Evidence-Based Proposal

By Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin & Natalie M. Orr

December 1, 2014

Related Lectures

Discussions on Juror Questions of Witnesses and the Use of Illustrative Aids at Trial

Introductory Remarks

By The Honorable Susan R. Bolton

Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules: Conference on Best Practices for Managing Daubert Questions

Conference on Proposed Amendments: Experts, the Rule of Completeness, and Sequestration of Witnesses

The Duty to Investigate and the Availability of Expert Witnesses

By Stephen A. Saltzburg

Deceptively Simple: Framing, Intuition, and Judicial Gatekeeping of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods Evidence

By Jane Campbell Moriarty

Fast Times in Federal Court and the Need for Flexibility

Fixing Rule 702: The PCAST Report and Steps to Ensure the Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods in the Criminal Courts

By Eric S. Lander

How Daubert and Its Progeny Have Failed Criminalistics Evidence and a Few Things the Judiciary Could Do About It

By David H. Kaye

Join Our Mailing List