How Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys Differ in Their Use of Neuroscience Evidence – Fordham Law Review

Symposium

How Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys Differ in Their Use of Neuroscience Evidence

By Deborah W. Denno

October 26, 2016

Related Reads

Symposium

By Deborah W. Denno

Correctional Change Through Neuroscience

By Arielle R. Baskin-Sommers & Karelle Fonteneau

Neuroscience and Criminal Law: Have We Been Getting It Wrong for Centuries and Where Do We Go from Here?

By Elizabeth Bennett

A Glimpse Inside the Brain’s Black Box: Understanding the Role of Neuroscience in Criminal Sentencing

By Bernice B. Donald & Erica Bakies

Can Neuroscience Help Predict Future Antisocial Behavior?

By Lyn M. Gaudet, Jason P. Kerkmans, Nathaniel E. Anderson & Kent A. Kiehl

Neuroscience and Sentencing

By Nancy Gertner

Join Our Mailing List