Is Compulsory Court-Annexed Medical Malpractice Arbitration Constitutional? How the Debate Reflects a Trend Towards Compulsion in Alternative Dispute Resolution – Fordham Law Review

Notes

Is Compulsory Court-Annexed Medical Malpractice Arbitration Constitutional? How the Debate Reflects a Trend Towards Compulsion in Alternative Dispute Resolution

By Matthew Parrott

August 14, 2012

April 2007

Vol. 75

No. 5

Related Reads

Notes

Executioner Identities: Toward Recognizing a Right to Know Who Is Hiding Beneath the Hood

Interpreting Congressional Silence: CAFA’s Jurisdictional Burden of Proof in Post-removal Remand Proceedings

By Jeffrey L. Roether

Join Our Mailing List