Prior Inconsistent Statements and Substantive Evidence—Federal Rule 801(D)(1)(A): The Compromise – Fordham Law Review

Lectures

Prior Inconsistent Statements and Substantive Evidence—Federal Rule 801(D)(1)(A): The Compromise

By Stephen A. Saltzburg

February 22, 2016

March 2016

Vol. 84

No. 4

Related Reads

Lectures

Rethinking the Rationale(s) for Hearsay Exceptions

By Stephen A. Salzburg

Reality Check: A Modest Modification to Rationalize Rule 803 Hearsay Exceptions

By Liesa L. Richter

By the Honorable Richard A. Posner

Forward Progress: A New Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction for Impeachment with Prior Inconsistent Statements Will Ease the Court’s Burden by Emphasizing the Prosecutor’s

By Hugh M. Mundy

Prior Statements of Testifying Witnesses: Drafting Choices to Eliminate or Loosen the Strictures of the Hearsay Rule

By Daniel J. Capra

The British Experience with Hearsay Reform: A Cautionary Tale

By Mark S. Brodin

Join Our Mailing List