Skip to content
Home
About
Issues
Symposia
Online
Lectures
Contact
Menu
Home
About
Issues
Symposia
Online
Lectures
Contact
Search
Search
Lectures
Rethinking the Rationale(s) for Hearsay Exceptions
By
Stephen A. Salzburg
February 22, 2016
Continue Reading in The Full PDF
March 2016
Vol. 84
No. 4
PDF
Related Reads
Lectures
Prior Inconsistent Statements and Substantive Evidence—Federal Rule 801(D)(1)(A): The Compromise
By
Stephen A. Saltzburg
Reality Check: A Modest Modification to Rationalize Rule 803 Hearsay Exceptions
By
Liesa L. Richter
On Hearsay
By
the Honorable Richard A. Posner
Forward Progress: A New Pattern Criminal Jury Instruction for Impeachment with Prior Inconsistent Statements Will Ease the Court’s Burden by Emphasizing the Prosecutor’s
By
Hugh M. Mundy
Prior Statements of Testifying Witnesses: Drafting Choices to Eliminate or Loosen the Strictures of the Hearsay Rule
By
Daniel J. Capra
The British Experience with Hearsay Reform: A Cautionary Tale
By
Mark S. Brodin