Issues

March 2018 | Vol. 86, No. 4

ARTICLES

Civil Procedure and the Ministerial Exception

By Peter J. Smith & Robert W. Tuttle

The History of the Modern Class Action, Part II: Litigation and Legitimacy, 1981-1994

By David Marcus

A Modern Union for the Modern Economy

By Jeffrey M. Hirsch & Joseph A. Seiner

Notes

Krupski and Relation Back for Claims Against John Doe Defendants

By Meg Tomlinson

A New Model for Oversight of Commercial Activities by Nonprofits?

By Jannon Stein

The “Unwelcome Obligation”: Why Neither State nor Federal Courts Should Draw District Lines

By Sara N. Nordstrand

Heller‘s Collateral Damage: As-Applied Challenges to the Felon-in-Possession Prohibition

By Carly Lagrotteria

Beyond Microsoft: A Legislative Solution to the SCA’s Extraterritoriality Problem

By Andrew Kirschenbaum

Regulating Rare Disease: Safely Facilitating Access to Orphan Drugs

By Julien B. Bannister

loading...

Colloquium

Nothing found

Comments

Nothing found

Dedications

Nothing found

Errata

Nothing found

Essays

Nothing found

Forewords

Foreword: Symposium on Forensic Testimony, Daubert, and Rule 702

By Daniel J. Capra

Forum

Nothing found

Lectures

Nothing found

Symposia

Online Companion: Scientific Excellence in the Forensic Science Community

By Alice R. Isenberg & Cary T. Oien

Online Companion: Scientific Validity and Error Rates: A Short Response to the Pcast Report

By Ted Robert Hunt

Online Companion: The Reliability of the Adversarial System to Assess the Scientific Validity of Forensic Evidence

By Andrew D. Goldsmith

The Duty to Investigate and the Availability of Expert Witnesses

By Stephen A. Saltzburg

Deceptively Simple: Framing, Intuition, and Judicial Gatekeeping of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods Evidence

By Jane Campbell Moriarty

Fast Times in Federal Court and the Need for Flexibility

Fixing Rule 702: The PCAST Report and Steps to Ensure the Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods in the Criminal Courts

By Eric S. Lander

How Daubert and Its Progeny Have Failed Criminalistics Evidence and a Few Things the Judiciary Could Do About It

By David H. Kaye

The Critical Role of Statistics in Demonstrating the Reliability of Expert Evidence

By Karen Kafadar

Challenges Facing Judges Regarding Expert Evidence in Criminal Cases

By Paul W. Grimm

The Myth of the Reliability Test

By Brandon L. Garrett

Fiddling While Rome Burns: The Story of the Federal Rules and Experts

By Ronald J. Allen

Symposium on Forensic Expert Testimony, Daubert, and Rule 702

Reports

Nothing found

Volume 93

• October 2024 | Vol. 93, No. 1
• November 2024 | Vol. 93, No. 2

Volume 92

• October 2023 | Vol. 92, No. 1
• November 2023 | Vol. 92, No. 2
• December 2023 | Vol. 92, No. 3
• March 2024 | Vol. 92, No. 4
• April 2024 | Vol. 92, No. 5
• May 2024 | Vol. 92, No. 6

Volume 91

• October 2022 | Vol. 91, No. 1
• November 2022 | Vol. 91, No. 2
• December 2022 | Vol. 91, No. 3
• March 2023 | Vol. 91, No. 4
• April 2023 | Vol. 91, No. 5
• May 2023 | Vol. 91, No. 6

Volume 90

• October 2021 | Vol. 90, No. 1
• November 2021 | Vol. 90, No. 2
• December 2021 | Vol. 90, No. 3
• March 2022 | Vol. 90, No. 4
• April 2022 | Vol. 90, No. 5
• May 2022 | Vol. 90, No. 6

Volume 89

• October 2020 | Vol. 89, No. 1
• November 2020 | Vol. 89, No. 2
• December 2020 | Vol. 89, No. 3
• March 2021 | Vol. 89, No. 4
• April 2021 | Vol. 89, No. 5
• May 2021 | Vol. 89, No. 6

Volume 88

• October 2019 | Vol. 88, No. 1
• November 2019 | Vol. 88, No. 2
• December 2019 | Vol. 88, No. 3
• March 2020 | Vol. 88, No. 4
• April 2020 | Vol. 88, No. 5
• May 2020 | Vol. 88, No. 6

Volume 87

• October 2018 | Vol. 87, No. 1
• November 2018 | Vol. 87, No. 2
• December 2018 | Vol. 87, No. 3
• March 2019 | Vol. 87, No. 4
• April 2019 | Vol. 87, No. 5
• May 2019 | Vol. 87, No. 6

Volume 86

• October 2017 | Vol. 86, No. 1
• November 2017 | Vol. 86, No. 2
• December 2017 | Vol. 86, No. 3
• March 2018 | Vol. 86, No. 4
• April 2018 | Vol. 86, No. 5
• May 2018| Vol. 86, No. 6

Volume 85

• October 2016 | Vol. 85, No. 1
• November 2016 | Vol. 85, No. 2
• December 2016 | Vol. 85, No. 3
• March 2017 | Vol. 85, No. 4
• April 2017 | Vol. 85, No. 5
• May 2017 | Vol. 85, No. 6

Volume 84

• October 2015 | Vol. 84, No. 1
• November 2015 | Vol. 84, No. 2
• December 2015 | Vol. 84, No. 3
• March 2016 | Vol. 84, No. 4
• April 2016 | Vol. 84, No. 5
• May 2016 | Vol. 84, No. 6

Volume 83

• October 2014 | Vol. 83, No. 1
• November 2014 | Vol. 83, No. 2
• December 2014 | Vol. 83, No. 3
• March 2015 | Vol. 83, No. 4
• April 2015 | Vol. 83, No. 5
• May 2015 | Vol. 83, No. 6

Volume 82

• October 2013 | Vol. 82, No. 1
• November 2013 | Vol. 82, No. 2
• December 2013 | Vol. 82, No. 3
• March 2014 | Vol. 82, No. 4
• April 2014 | Vol. 82, No. 5
• May 2014 | Vol. 82, No. 6

Volume 81

• October 2012 | Vol. 81, No. 1
• November 2012 | Vol. 81, No. 2
• December 2012 | Vol. 81, No. 3
• March 2013 | Vol. 81, No. 4
• April 2013 | Vol. 81, No. 5
• May 2013 | Vol. 81, No. 6

Volume 80

• October 2011 | Vol. 80, No. 1
• November 2011 | Vol. 80, No. 2
• December 2011 | Vol. 80, No. 3
• March 2012 | Vol. 80, No. 4
• April 2012 | Vol. 80, No. 5
• May 2012 | Vol. 80, No. 6

Volume 79

• October 2010 | Vol. 79, No. 1
• November 2010 | Vol. 79, No. 2
• December 2010 | Vol. 79, No. 3
• March 2011 | Vol. 79, No. 4
• April 2011 | Vol. 79, No. 5
• May 2011 | Vol. 79, No. 6

Volume 78

• October 2009 | Vol. 78, No. 1
• November 2009 | Vol. 78, No. 2
• December 2009 | Vol. 78, No. 3
• March 2010 | Vol. 78, No. 4
• April 2010 | Vol. 78, No. 5
• May 2010 | Vol. 78, No. 6

Volume 77

• October 2008 | Vol. 77, No. 1
• November 2008 | Vol. 77, No. 2
• December 2008 | Vol. 77, No. 3
• March 2009 | Vol. 77, No. 4
• April 2009 | Vol. 77, No. 5
• May 2009 | Vol. 77, No. 6

Volume 76

• October 2007 | Vol. 76, No. 1
• November 2007 | Vol. 76, No. 2
• December 2007 | Vol. 76, No. 3
• March 2008 | Vol. 76, No. 4
• April 2008 | Vol. 76, No. 5
• May 2008 | Vol. 76, No. 6

Volume 75

• October 2006 | Vol. 75, No. 1
• November 2006 | Vol. 75, No. 2
• December 2006 | Vol. 75, No. 3
• March 2007 | Vol. 75, No. 4
• April 2007 | Vol. 75, No. 5
• May 2007 | Vol. 75, No. 6

Volume 74

• October 2005 | Vol. 74, No. 1
• November 2005 | Vol. 74, No. 2
• December 2005 | Vol. 74, No. 3
• March 2006 | Vol. 74, No. 4
• April 2006 | Vol. 74, No. 5
• May 2006 | Vol. 74, No. 6

Volume 73

• October 2004 | Vol. 73, No. 1
• November 2004 | Vol. 73, No. 2
• December 2004 | Vol. 73, No. 3
• March 2005 | Vol. 73, No. 4
• April 2005 | Vol. 73, No. 5
• May 2005 | Vol. 73, No. 6

Volume 72

• October 2003 | Vol. 72, No. 1
• November 2003 | Vol. 72, No. 2
• December 2003 | Vol. 72, No. 3
• March 2004 | Vol. 72, No. 4
• April 2004 | Vol. 72, No. 5
• May 2004 | Vol. 72, No. 6

Volume 71

• October 2002 | Vol. 71, No. 1
• November 2002 | Vol. 71, No. 2
• December 2002 | Vol. 71, No. 3
• March 2003 | Vol. 71, No. 4
• April 2003 | Vol. 71, No. 5
• May 2003 | Vol. 71, No. 6

Volume 70

• October 2001 | Vol. 70, No. 1
• November 2001 | Vol. 70, No. 2
• December 2001 | Vol. 70, No. 3
• March 2002 | Vol. 70, No. 4
• April 2002 | Vol. 70, No. 5
• May 2002 | Vol. 70, No. 6

Volume 69

• October 2000 | Vol. 69, No. 1
• November 2000 | Vol. 69, No. 2
• December 2000 | Vol. 69, No. 3
• March 2001 | Vol. 69, No. 4
• April 2001 | Vol. 69, No. 5
• May 2001 | Vol. 69, No. 6

Volume 68

• October 1999 | Vol. 68, No. 1
• November 1999 | Vol. 68, No. 2
• December 1999 | Vol. 68, No. 3
• March 2000 | Vol. 68, No. 4
• April 2000 | Vol. 68, No. 5
• May 2000 | Vol. 68, No. 6