Issues

May 2012 | Vol. 80, No. 6

ARTICLES

State Ownership and Corporate Governance

By Mariana Pargendler

Notes

E Pluribus Unum? The Full Faith and Credit Clause and Meaningful Recognition of Out-of-State Adoptions

By Pamela K. Terry

A Textbook Dilemma: Should the First Sale Doctrine Provide a Valid Defense for Foreign-Made Goods?

By Melissa Goldberg

Getting to “Exempt!”: Putting the Rubber Stamp on Section 501(c)(3)’s Political Activity Prohibition

By Michael Fresco

Whither Fairness? In Search of a Jurisdictional Test After J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro

By Peter R. Bryce

loading...

Colloquium

Nothing found

Comments

Nothing found

Dedications

Nothing found

Errata

Nothing found

Essays

Nothing found

Forewords

Foreword

By Bruce A. Green

Forum

Nothing found

Lectures

Nothing found

Symposia

Corporate Law Firms, NGOs, and Issues of Legitimacy for a Global Legal Order

By Yves Dezalay & Bryant G. Garth

Law Firms, Global Capital, and the Sociological Imagination

By Christine Parker & Tanina Rostain

States Side Story: Career Paths of International LL.M. Students, or “I Like to Be in America”

By Carole Silver

Homeward Bound: What Does a Global Legal Education Offer the Indian Returnees?

By Swethaa Ballakrishnen

Minorities, Merit, and Misrecognition in the Globalized Profession

By Hilary Sommerlad

Becoming a Cosmopolitan Lawyer

By John Flood & Peter D. Lederer

Regulating Conflicts of Interest in Global Law Firms: Peace in Our Time?

By Janine Griffiths-Baker & Nancy J. Moore

International Law Firms in China: Market Access and Ethical Risks

By Mark A. Cohen

Privatizing Professionalism: Client Control of Lawyers’ Ethics

By Christopher J. Whelan & Neta Ziv

Organizational Alliances by U.S. Law Schools

By Elizabeth Chambliss

Alliance “Capitalism” and Legal Education: An English Perspective

By James Faulconbridge

Trends and Challenges in Lawyer Regulation: The Impact of Globalization and Technology

By Laurel S. Terry, Steve Mark, @fordhamlawreview.org & Tahlia Gordon

Adopting Regulatory Objectives for the Legal Profession

By Laurel S. Terry, Steve Mark, @fordhamlawreview.org & Tahlia Gordon

Comparative Perspectives on Lawyer Regulation: An Agenda for Reform in the United States and Canada

By Deborah L. Rhode & Alice Woolley

Nonlawyers Influencing Lawyers: Too Many Cooks in the Kitchen or Stone Soup?

By Michele DeStefano

The Learning Process of Globalization: How Chinese Law Firms Survived the Financial Crisis

By Xueyao Li & Sida Liu

Smart Growth: The Large Law Firm in the Twenty-First Century

By Eli Wald

Reports

Nothing found

Volume 93

• October 2024 | Vol. 93, No. 1
• November 2024 | Vol. 93, No. 2
• December 2024 | Vol. 93, No. 3
• March 2025 | Vol. 93, No. 4

Volume 92

• October 2023 | Vol. 92, No. 1
• November 2023 | Vol. 92, No. 2
• December 2023 | Vol. 92, No. 3
• March 2024 | Vol. 92, No. 4
• April 2024 | Vol. 92, No. 5
• May 2024 | Vol. 92, No. 6

Volume 91

• October 2022 | Vol. 91, No. 1
• November 2022 | Vol. 91, No. 2
• December 2022 | Vol. 91, No. 3
• March 2023 | Vol. 91, No. 4
• April 2023 | Vol. 91, No. 5
• May 2023 | Vol. 91, No. 6

Volume 90

• October 2021 | Vol. 90, No. 1
• November 2021 | Vol. 90, No. 2
• December 2021 | Vol. 90, No. 3
• March 2022 | Vol. 90, No. 4
• April 2022 | Vol. 90, No. 5
• May 2022 | Vol. 90, No. 6

Volume 89

• October 2020 | Vol. 89, No. 1
• November 2020 | Vol. 89, No. 2
• December 2020 | Vol. 89, No. 3
• March 2021 | Vol. 89, No. 4
• April 2021 | Vol. 89, No. 5
• May 2021 | Vol. 89, No. 6

Volume 88

• October 2019 | Vol. 88, No. 1
• November 2019 | Vol. 88, No. 2
• December 2019 | Vol. 88, No. 3
• March 2020 | Vol. 88, No. 4
• April 2020 | Vol. 88, No. 5
• May 2020 | Vol. 88, No. 6

Volume 87

• October 2018 | Vol. 87, No. 1
• November 2018 | Vol. 87, No. 2
• December 2018 | Vol. 87, No. 3
• March 2019 | Vol. 87, No. 4
• April 2019 | Vol. 87, No. 5
• May 2019 | Vol. 87, No. 6

Volume 86

• October 2017 | Vol. 86, No. 1
• November 2017 | Vol. 86, No. 2
• December 2017 | Vol. 86, No. 3
• March 2018 | Vol. 86, No. 4
• April 2018 | Vol. 86, No. 5
• May 2018| Vol. 86, No. 6

Volume 85

• October 2016 | Vol. 85, No. 1
• November 2016 | Vol. 85, No. 2
• December 2016 | Vol. 85, No. 3
• March 2017 | Vol. 85, No. 4
• April 2017 | Vol. 85, No. 5
• May 2017 | Vol. 85, No. 6

Volume 84

• October 2015 | Vol. 84, No. 1
• November 2015 | Vol. 84, No. 2
• December 2015 | Vol. 84, No. 3
• March 2016 | Vol. 84, No. 4
• April 2016 | Vol. 84, No. 5
• May 2016 | Vol. 84, No. 6

Volume 83

• October 2014 | Vol. 83, No. 1
• November 2014 | Vol. 83, No. 2
• December 2014 | Vol. 83, No. 3
• March 2015 | Vol. 83, No. 4
• April 2015 | Vol. 83, No. 5
• May 2015 | Vol. 83, No. 6

Volume 82

• October 2013 | Vol. 82, No. 1
• November 2013 | Vol. 82, No. 2
• December 2013 | Vol. 82, No. 3
• March 2014 | Vol. 82, No. 4
• April 2014 | Vol. 82, No. 5
• May 2014 | Vol. 82, No. 6

Volume 81

• October 2012 | Vol. 81, No. 1
• November 2012 | Vol. 81, No. 2
• December 2012 | Vol. 81, No. 3
• March 2013 | Vol. 81, No. 4
• April 2013 | Vol. 81, No. 5
• May 2013 | Vol. 81, No. 6

Volume 80

• October 2011 | Vol. 80, No. 1
• November 2011 | Vol. 80, No. 2
• December 2011 | Vol. 80, No. 3
• March 2012 | Vol. 80, No. 4
• April 2012 | Vol. 80, No. 5
• May 2012 | Vol. 80, No. 6

Volume 79

• October 2010 | Vol. 79, No. 1
• November 2010 | Vol. 79, No. 2
• December 2010 | Vol. 79, No. 3
• March 2011 | Vol. 79, No. 4
• April 2011 | Vol. 79, No. 5
• May 2011 | Vol. 79, No. 6

Volume 78

• October 2009 | Vol. 78, No. 1
• November 2009 | Vol. 78, No. 2
• December 2009 | Vol. 78, No. 3
• March 2010 | Vol. 78, No. 4
• April 2010 | Vol. 78, No. 5
• May 2010 | Vol. 78, No. 6

Volume 77

• October 2008 | Vol. 77, No. 1
• November 2008 | Vol. 77, No. 2
• December 2008 | Vol. 77, No. 3
• March 2009 | Vol. 77, No. 4
• April 2009 | Vol. 77, No. 5
• May 2009 | Vol. 77, No. 6

Volume 76

• October 2007 | Vol. 76, No. 1
• November 2007 | Vol. 76, No. 2
• December 2007 | Vol. 76, No. 3
• March 2008 | Vol. 76, No. 4
• April 2008 | Vol. 76, No. 5
• May 2008 | Vol. 76, No. 6

Volume 75

• October 2006 | Vol. 75, No. 1
• November 2006 | Vol. 75, No. 2
• December 2006 | Vol. 75, No. 3
• March 2007 | Vol. 75, No. 4
• April 2007 | Vol. 75, No. 5
• May 2007 | Vol. 75, No. 6

Volume 74

• October 2005 | Vol. 74, No. 1
• November 2005 | Vol. 74, No. 2
• December 2005 | Vol. 74, No. 3
• March 2006 | Vol. 74, No. 4
• April 2006 | Vol. 74, No. 5
• May 2006 | Vol. 74, No. 6

Volume 73

• October 2004 | Vol. 73, No. 1
• November 2004 | Vol. 73, No. 2
• December 2004 | Vol. 73, No. 3
• March 2005 | Vol. 73, No. 4
• April 2005 | Vol. 73, No. 5
• May 2005 | Vol. 73, No. 6

Volume 72

• October 2003 | Vol. 72, No. 1
• November 2003 | Vol. 72, No. 2
• December 2003 | Vol. 72, No. 3
• March 2004 | Vol. 72, No. 4
• April 2004 | Vol. 72, No. 5
• May 2004 | Vol. 72, No. 6

Volume 71

• October 2002 | Vol. 71, No. 1
• November 2002 | Vol. 71, No. 2
• December 2002 | Vol. 71, No. 3
• March 2003 | Vol. 71, No. 4
• April 2003 | Vol. 71, No. 5
• May 2003 | Vol. 71, No. 6

Volume 70

• October 2001 | Vol. 70, No. 1
• November 2001 | Vol. 70, No. 2
• December 2001 | Vol. 70, No. 3
• March 2002 | Vol. 70, No. 4
• April 2002 | Vol. 70, No. 5
• May 2002 | Vol. 70, No. 6

Volume 69

• October 2000 | Vol. 69, No. 1
• November 2000 | Vol. 69, No. 2
• December 2000 | Vol. 69, No. 3
• March 2001 | Vol. 69, No. 4
• April 2001 | Vol. 69, No. 5
• May 2001 | Vol. 69, No. 6

Volume 68

• October 1999 | Vol. 68, No. 1
• November 1999 | Vol. 68, No. 2
• December 1999 | Vol. 68, No. 3
• March 2000 | Vol. 68, No. 4
• April 2000 | Vol. 68, No. 5
• May 2000 | Vol. 68, No. 6