Skip to content
Home
About
Issues
Symposia
Online
Lectures
Contact
Menu
Home
About
Issues
Symposia
Online
Lectures
Contact
Search
Search
Forensic Expert Testimony, Daubert, and Rule 702
The Duty to Investigate and the Availability of Expert Witnesses
By
Stephen A. Saltzburg
Deceptively Simple: Framing, Intuition, and Judicial Gatekeeping of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods Evidence
By
Jane Campbell Moriarty
Fast Times in Federal Court and the Need for Flexibility
Fixing Rule 702: The PCAST Report and Steps to Ensure the Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods in the Criminal Courts
By
Eric S. Lander
How
Daubert
and Its Progeny Have Failed Criminalistics Evidence and a Few Things the Judiciary Could Do About It
By
David H. Kaye
The Critical Role of Statistics in Demonstrating the Reliability of Expert Evidence
By
Karen Kafadar
Challenges Facing Judges Regarding Expert Evidence in Criminal Cases
By
Paul W. Grimm
The Myth of the Reliability Test
By
Brandon L. Garrett
Fiddling While Rome Burns: The Story of the Federal Rules and Experts
By
Ronald J. Allen
Symposium on Forensic Expert Testimony,
Daubert
, and Rule 702
loading...
Discover More