Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Symposia
  • Online
  • Lectures
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Issues
  • Symposia
  • Online
  • Lectures
  • Contact
Search

Forensic Expert Testimony, Daubert, and Rule 702

The Duty to Investigate and the Availability of Expert Witnesses
By Stephen A. Saltzburg
Deceptively Simple: Framing, Intuition, and Judicial Gatekeeping of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods Evidence
By Jane Campbell Moriarty
Fast Times in Federal Court and the Need for Flexibility
Fixing Rule 702: The PCAST Report and Steps to Ensure the Reliability of Forensic Feature-Comparison Methods in the Criminal Courts
By Eric S. Lander
How Daubert and Its Progeny Have Failed Criminalistics Evidence and a Few Things the Judiciary Could Do About It
By David H. Kaye
The Critical Role of Statistics in Demonstrating the Reliability of Expert Evidence
By Karen Kafadar
Challenges Facing Judges Regarding Expert Evidence in Criminal Cases
By Paul W. Grimm
The Myth of the Reliability Test
By Brandon L. Garrett
Fiddling While Rome Burns: The Story of the Federal Rules and Experts
By Ronald J. Allen
Symposium on Forensic Expert Testimony, Daubert, and Rule 702
loading...
Discover More
  • Symposia
  • Issue
  • Fordham Law Review Online

Join Our Mailing List

  • About
  • Contact
  • Lectures
  • FORDHAM LAW REVIEW ©2023